TL;DR
Turn the school run and nap time into listening time
- Thousands of audiobooks, podcasts and originals
- Listen on your phone, tablet or Echo — also offline
- Cancel anytime
A USC report cited by The 74 found that about half of California school board candidates are likely running unopposed, while current members described reasons they may not seek reelection. Those reasons include heavy workloads, budget disputes, labor conflict and a hostile political climate; the report also found many members want more training.
About half of California school board candidates are likely to run unopposed, according to a recent USC report described by The 74, as board members cite stress, long hours and disillusionment among reasons for not seeking reelection. The report’s findings raise concerns about public scrutiny and the range of choices voters may have in races overseeing local schools.
School board members interviewed for the report described pressure from budget cuts, labor disputes and school closures, as well as immigration raids affecting schools and young people. Members also pointed to a politically charged environment around curriculum and student rights. USC education professor Julie Marsh, a lead author, said many members had not expected the emotional toll of the role.
The workload can be substantial relative to compensation. Most California board members receive a stipend of a few hundred dollars a month, according to the report. A state law passed last year, Assembly Bill 1390, allows districts to pay members as much as $4,500 per month, depending on district size. Members told the report that the higher ceiling still may not match the time required, and that pay is not the main reason many serve.
Santa Rosa City Schools board president Nick Caston, elected in 2024, said he found the job more stressful and time-consuming than expected. His district initially considered closing one elementary school to address its budget, then expanded the proposal to six. Caston said the public response was difficult, particularly because board members can become the visible representatives of decisions shaped by circumstances beyond their control.
Fewer Choices in Local School Races
When candidates run unopposed, voters have fewer electoral choices, and candidates may receive less public scrutiny. Marsh warned that low competition can create room for organized interest groups to exert greater influence over school boards. The report says labor unions and conservative political groups have tried to elect members aligned with their priorities, and that some efforts have succeeded.
School boards make decisions affecting district budgets, staffing, school closures and student services. Turnover or a limited candidate pool can shape who participates in those decisions, particularly during periods of financial pressure and political conflict. The report documents members’ accounts and candidate patterns; it does not establish that any single factor explains the likely unopposed races.
Products Worth Considering
Owlet Dream Sock Smart Baby Monitor
Graco Modes Pramette 3-in-1 Stroller, Redmond
LEGO The Legend of Zelda Great Deku Tree 2-in-1 Set
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
Pay and Training Efforts
California has emphasized local control since adopting the Local Control Funding Formula, which gave districts greater latitude in spending and decision-making. The report describes a period of uncertainty for school boards as state and federal education policy shifts, alongside ongoing local disputes over budgets, labor and curriculum.
Efforts to support members include training from the California School Boards Association, which offers workshops, webinars and a 40-hour governance program. Training is not generally mandatory. The source says the state requires incoming members to take a two-hour ethics class, with a four-hour finance class due to be added the following year. A majority of board members surveyed for the USC report said they wanted more training, including on social media, evaluating programs and curricula, and managing political tensions.
The report also points to a countertrend: Latina representation has grown in some districts. A 2023 survey by Hispanas Organized for Political Equality found Latinas made up at least 20% of board members in California districts with large Latino student populations, and closer to 30% in Los Angeles and the Central Coast. The Oxnard School District board was entirely Latina, according to the report.
“We need more people, more choices, more public debate. Otherwise it opens the door for interest groups to step in and have outsized power.”
— Julie Marsh, USC education professor and report lead author
Limits of the Candidate Data
The source reports that about half of candidates are “most likely” running unopposed, rather than presenting a final count of uncontested races. It does not specify the election year for the Nov. 3 ballot or give the number of candidates and districts included in that estimate. The material also does not identify how many current members will decline to run, or quantify the share of departures attributable to each reason.
The report describes members’ experiences and survey responses, but the supplied account does not include the full methodology or survey sample details. It is also unclear whether higher pay or additional training will change recruitment or reelection decisions. The source’s discussion of Latina representation reflects specific districts and a 2023 survey, not a statewide trend across every school board.
Election and Training Milestones
Voters will see the school board contests on the Nov. 3 ballot, though the source does not specify the year or provide a final list of contested and uncontested races. Districts and election officials can clarify candidate totals as ballot information is finalized.
The next reported training change is the addition of a four-hour finance class for incoming board members, scheduled to begin the following year. It remains to be seen whether that requirement, voluntary governance programs or higher permitted compensation will affect the number of people who run or remain in office.
Key Questions
Why are some California school board members not seeking reelection?
Members cited emotional strain, long hours, low pay, budget cuts, labor conflict and political tensions. The report does not identify one cause that applies to everyone.
How many California school board candidates are running unopposed?
The USC report estimates that about half are likely to run unopposed. The supplied account does not give a final count or the number of races included.
How much can California school districts pay board members?
Assembly Bill 1390 allows districts to pay board members up to $4,500 a month, depending on district size. Most members have typically received a stipend of a few hundred dollars per month.
What training is required for new school board members?
The source says incoming members are required to take a two-hour ethics class. A four-hour finance class is scheduled to be added the following year; other association training is available but not mandatory.
Is Latina representation on California school boards increasing?
A 2023 survey cited in the report found Latinas held at least 20% of board seats in districts with large Latino student populations, with higher shares in Los Angeles and the Central Coast. Those figures do not establish a statewide increase across all districts.
Source: the74million.org
